The first two questions face anyone who cares to distinguish the real from the unreal and the true from the false. The third question faces anyone who makes any decisions at all, and even not deciding is itself a decision.
This should be a place for constructive conversation. Also in the cause of clarity: I did not say that the Sagan quote is a defense of theism. Physics Police And yet the quote stands in the middle of an argument over whether or not Cosmos did justice to theism in the first episode.
In particular, we have Jerry, who agrees that Cosmos missed a chance to build bridges. If science is compatible with theism, he may have a point. But science is NOT compatible with theism! If he keeps learning more and more science, there will be less and less room for theism.
This is why theists fear science, and why Bruno was burnt at the stake. And Sagan most definitely did believe in building bridges. He had zero room for mystical nonsense—but he very much wanted to make it clear that empiricism was not the enemy of spiritualism.
Bruno is the right hero for Cosmos not only because he exemplifies this inherent conflict, but also because he was the first person since antiquity to call the stars other suns! No matter how he arrived at it, this is a fantastic idea!
You attempt to claim Sagan as a fellow religious apologist. He found in science a similar emotional joy that others derive from their faith. I quoted Sagan on spirituality—his word, not mine—and suggested that the quote had something for both sides to consider.
The responses here illustrate the delicacy of the task Sagan was attempting. But back to the subject at hand. Bruno was not executed for believing other stars are suns at least not primarily ; his personal cosmic beliefs, innovative as they were, were not integrated into a sophisticated Copernican worldview; he was not the first to suggest that stars are other suns that was Nicolas of Cusa, a century earlier ; and he was not the first to consider an infinite expanse of stars that was Thomas Digges.
Ye Olde Statistician And Nicholas of Cusa was made a cardinal of the Church, which should indicate that the concern did not center on cosmology per se, but rather on the religious uses some people made of it.
ModernEra Sagan would be appalled at the way an entire wing of American politics is denying the findings of the entire scientific community on religious grounds.
Buddy That might come as a surprise to the Jesuits who run some of the most distinguished universities in the world, Georgetown for one.
Painting with such a broad kindergarten brush is a mark of a lazy mind. Paul Williams Science is not incompatible with the concept of a creator. Conceptually, entertaining a creator of vast intelligence is valid. The point being asserted by Neil deGrasse Tyson is that the scale and complexity of the universe should make any idea of a creator even more grand to entertain.
Anyone who resorts to call any and all theists absurd is him or herself a bigot.Mar 27, · I guess that depends on what we mean by "derivable". It seems to me that at the root of our biological functioning is a set of physical materials and principles, and that whenever those are put together in a way that makes a normal human, we get consciousness.
These are the indices in the Main namespace. There is a list of the other namespaces at the bottom of the page. Secular humanism, or simply humanism, is a philosophy or life stance that embraces human reason, ethics, and philosophical naturalism while specifically rejecting religious dogma, supernaturalism, pseudoscience, and superstition as the basis of morality and decision making..
Secular humanism posits that human beings are capable of being . The primary purpose of the College of Inner Awareness, Metaphysical Studies and Spiritual Studies is to train and educate prospective leaders for metaphysical ministries and schools through Distant-Learning or On-campus Training. Mar 27, · Here is an NDPR review of this book by Taylor for our mutual enlightenment on the issue of the relationship between language and .
Mar 10, · Along with his translations, Digges added commentary and new ideas, making it clear that the Copernican model was more than philosophy, it was a physically real model of the solar system.